Home Constitution District Clause The Role of Presidents in Local D.C. History
Feb 03
Friday
It's already tomorrow! You got things to activate!
The Role of Presidents in Local D.C. History E-mail
February 16, 2009
 
The Role of Presidents in Local DC History
 
District needs a champion in the White House
Qui tacet consentire videtur: Silence = consent.
 
by Mark David Richards
 
Presidents have been advocates and adversaries for the permanent residents of Washington, DC since it was founded by our first president as a national stage to embody American democracy. But most presidents have passively consented to the District’s disenfranchised status.
 
For more than 200 years DC citizens have sat on the sidelines, paying full federal and “state” taxes and performing all the duties of citizenship but with no vote in their national legislature. All the while they’ve done without local legislative, budgetary, or judicial autonomy.  Even today, the president submits the District’s local taxpayer-collected “state” budget to Congress for review, modification, and approval as a “federal appropriation;” selects its Superior Court and Court of Appeals judges for Senate confirmation, and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia is unique in that it also acts as DC’s local District Attorney (D.A.).  Congress frequently adds “riders” to the District’s budget bill to overrule local decision-making, often prohibiting the use of local tax dollars for local priorities and muzzling the local government on “touchy” subjects, such as DC statehood or equal rights.  The president has the authority to veto budget bills with such riders.
 
Although the founding fathers gave Congress exclusive legislative authority in all cases whatsoever over its seat of government in the Constitution, primarily for security reasons, the record shows they expected DC citizens to have local self-government and federal representation.  And DC has made some progress over two centuries.
 
President George Washington established the District of Columbia. He died eleven days after President John Adams announced the seat of government was ready for the nation’s 131 federal officials to join the 14,000 local residents. President John Adams told Congress, "You will consider [DC] as the capital of a great nation advancing with unexampled rapidity in arts, in commerce, in wealth, and in population, and possessing within itself those energies and resources which... will secure to it a long course of prosperity and self-government." 
 
American presidents, beginning with James Monroe in 1818, have championed DC political rights by calling on Congress to create “an arrangement better adapted to the principles of our government.” President Andrew Jackson in 1828 called on Congress to allow DC residents to elect a non-voting Delegate “with the same privileges that are allowed to other territories of the United States.”  It took until 1971 for Congress to act on the measure.
 
More often than not presidents have regarded DC political rights as a “local” issue and have been passive, in part because the issue has always been associated with conflict involving race, class, and ideology.  Today most agree that DC residents should have equal rights, but disagree of how to achieve the goal. Today, the topic is viewed as partisan—the majority of DC’s residents are Democrats.
 
In the 1840s, President John Tyler urged “parental care” over the seat of government and President James Polk told Congress he would “be ever disposed to show a proper regard for [the District’s] wishes,” but some DC residents were getting impatient. And so in 1846, residents in Alexandria City and County retroceded to and became part of Virginia, fragmenting George Washington’s diamond. But residents of Washington were intent on remaining the nation’s capital and winning equal rights—and decided to wait it out. And wait they have, through the Civil War, the Great War, and World War II.
 
Even as Lincoln emancipated slaves and District residents erected the first monument to him in front of its City Hall, a new kind of federal official emerged that was hostile toward self-government. In 1874, Congress abolished DC home rule and replaced it with a 3-member commission appointed by the president, Ulysses S. Grant. Federal officials turned to repairing the capital after Civil War wear and tear.  President Howard Taft in 1921, while advocating for a great capital, said, "The truth is this is a city governed by a popular body, to wit, the Congress of the United States, selected from the people of the United States who own Washington." And so the idea that DC residents were represented by officials they had no say in electing gained credence. President George W. Bush expressed a similar view.
 
Support for DC political progress has crossed party lines. In 1952, President Harry Truman became a DC champion. He told Congress, "I strongly believe that the citizens of the District of Columbia are entitled to self-government… local self-government is both the right and the responsibility of free men. The denial of self-government does not befit the National Capital of the world’s largest and most powerful democracy.”
 
Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Richard Nixon all urged Congress to overturn the presidentially-appointed commissioner government and institute limited home rule, but Congress was slow to act as powerful southern segregationists blocked efforts. In 1960, Congress passed and President Kennedy supported the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution, giving DC the right to vote for President. Ironically, southern segregationists in Congress supported the bill in hopes that they would slow black equality by tossing a breadcrumb to the movement. The Amendment was ratified—beginning with Hawaii—in 1961. For the first time in 1964, DC citizens voted in record numbers for President Lyndon B. Johnson. 
 
President Johnson, perhaps the District’s greatest champion, used his presidential powers in unprecedented ways to reorganize the DC government to prepare for home rule.  Political progress continued under President Nixon. In 1970, Congress established a “state like” court system for the District, and in 1971 Congress granted the District a nonvoting Delegate—a position now held by Eleanor Holmes Norton, and in 1973 Congress passed and President Nixon signed a bill on Christmas Eve giving DC a home rule government with an elected mayor and council, which today oversees most of the functions of a state, county and city all in one. 
 
In 1978, Congress proposed and President Jimmy Carter supported a Constitutional amendment to give DC full representation in Congress. But the amendment expired in 1985 as the nation elected President Ronald Reagan. District citizens continued their push for full rights by petitioning Congress to become the state of New Columbia, with full and equal rights. With the election of President Bill Clinton and Democratic control of the Congress in 1992, the District became hopeful that it could win. In 1993, the House voted on the issue and DC lost by 63 votes, with one Republican supporter and many Democratic opponents.
 
Nationally representative surveys that I have directed show that most Americans are unaware of the District’s quandary, but when told about it many are stunned and large majorities support equal Congressional voting rights—voting rights is, after all, an American birthright. More Americans support passage of a Constitutional Amendment than support retrocession to Maryland or creating the state of New Columbia. But the District would require both a presidential champion and a massive national outreach effort to mobilize Americans to persuade two-thirds of both houses of Congress to propose a Constitutional Amendment and three-fourths of the states to affirm it.  And Congress is not showing any interest in DC statehood these days.
 
Over the past decade, DC citizens have pushed for more rights even as their rights have been removed or diminished. Locally elected officials have lowered their demands and today many are willing to accept less than equal rights because the road to equality appears far off and the prospects dismal. At a time when the people of the District of Columbia are hopeful at the election of President Barack Obama,
and many wish for a champion, most are not delusional.  Although presidents come and go and the more things change the more they seem to stay the same, District citizens keep pressing their case.
 
Mark David Richards is a Washington, DC sociologist and senior vice president of KRC Research.  He is author of “The Debates over the Retrocession of the District of Columbia, 1801–2004” published in Washington History (Spring/Summer 2004) http://www.dcvote.org/trellis/struggle/mdrretrocession.pdf and “Excremental Progress: Reflections on Sewer Society and Recycled Myths,” a history of the DC sewer system, published by dcenter architechural journal http://www.dcenter.net/
 
///
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
Presidential Messages to Congress
 
President James Monroe (1818): “The situation of this District… requires the attention of Congress.  By the Constitution, the power of legislation is exclusively vested in the Congress of the United States.  In the exercise of this power, in which the people have no participation, Congress legislates in all cases, directly, on the local concerns of the District.  As this is a departure, for a special purpose, from the general principles of our system, it may merit consideration, whether an arrangement better adapted to the principles of our government, and to the particular interest of the people, may not be devised, which will neither infringe the constitution nor affect the object which the provision in question was intended to secure.  The growing population… and the increasing business of the District, which it is believed already interferes with the deliberations of Congress on great national concerns, furnish additional motives for recommending this subject to your consideration.”
 
President Andrew Jackson (1828): Urged Congress to allow DC residents to elect a nonvoting Delegate to that body "with the same privileges that are allowed to other territories of the United States."  In 1831, Jackson again sent a message to Congress saying, “I deem it my duty again to call your attention to the condition of the District of Columbia.  It was doubtless wise in the framers of our Constitution to place the people of this District under the jurisdiction of the general government, but to accomplish the objects they had in view it is not necessary that this people should be deprived of all the privileges of self-government.  Independently of the difficulty of inducing the representatives of distant states to turn their attention to projects of laws which are not of the highest interest to their constituents, they are not individually, nor in Congress collectively, well qualified to legislate over the local concerns of this District.  Consequently its interests are much neglected and the people are almost afraid to present their grievances, lest a body in which they are not represented wand which feels little sympathy in their local relations should in its attempt to make laws for them do more harm than good.  … Is it not just to allow them at least a delegate to Congress, if not a local legislature, to make laws for the District, subject to the approval or rejection of Congress? I earnestly recommend the extension to them of every political right which their interests require and which may be compatible with the Constitution.” 

President William Henry Harrison (1841): "The people of the District of Columbia are not the subjects of the people of the States, but free American citizens. Being in the latter condition when the Constitution was formed, no words used in that instrument could have been intended to deprive them of that character. If there is anything in the great principle of unalienable rights so emphatically insisted upon in our Declaration of Independence, they could neither make nor the United States accept a surrender of their liberties and become the subjects of their former fellow-citizens. …[T]he grant to Congress of exclusive jurisdiction in the District of Columbia can be interpreted, so far as respects the aggregate people of the United States, as meaning nothing more than to allow to Congress the controlling power necessary to afford a free and safe exercise of the functions assigned to the General Government by the Constitution. In all other respects the legislation of Congress should be adapted to their peculiar position and wants and be conformable with their deliberate opinions of their own interests.” 
 
President Harry Truman (1952): "I strongly believe that the citizens of the District of Columbia are entitled to self-government . . . local self-government is both the right and the responsibility of free men. The denial of self-government does not befit the National Capital of the world’s largest and most powerful democracy.  Not only is the lack of self-government an injustice to the people of the District of Columbia, but it imposes a needless burden on Congress and it tends to controvert the principles for which this country stands before the world…”

President Richard Nixon (1969): "The District's citizens should not be expected to pay taxes for a government which they have no part in choosing -- or to bear the full burdens of citizenship without the full rights of citizens.”  "It should offend the democratic sense of this nation that the 850,000 citizens of its Capitol, comprising a population larger than 11 of its states, have no voice in the Congress."
 
 
Home Constitution District Clause The Role of Presidents in Local D.C. History

Profile Information

Application afterLoad: 0.001 seconds, 0.29 MB
Application afterInitialise: 0.082 seconds, 1.36 MB
Application afterRoute: 0.089 seconds, 2.04 MB
Application afterDispatch: 0.122 seconds, 2.51 MB
Application afterRender: 0.312 seconds, 2.99 MB

Memory Usage

3172136

16 queries logged

  1. SELECT *
      FROM jos_session
      WHERE session_id = '6jsges2hog76luadup4dasqu07'
  2. DELETE
      FROM jos_session
      WHERE ( TIME < '1675409922' )
  3. SELECT *
      FROM jos_session
      WHERE session_id = '6jsges2hog76luadup4dasqu07'
  4. INSERT INTO `jos_session` ( `session_id`,`time`,`username`,`gid`,`guest`,`client_id` )
      VALUES ( '6jsges2hog76luadup4dasqu07','1675412322','','0','1','0' )
  5. SELECT *
      FROM jos_components
      WHERE parent = 0
  6. SELECT folder AS TYPE, element AS name, params
      FROM jos_plugins
      WHERE published >= 1
      AND access <= 0
      ORDER BY ordering
  7. SELECT *
      FROM jos_migration_backlinks
      WHERE url LIKE 'option=com\_content&view=article&id=118:the-role-of-presidents-in-local-dc-history&catid=50:district-clause&Itemid=60%' OR sefurl LIKE 'option=com\_content&view=article&id=118:the-role-of-presidents-in-local-dc-history&catid=50:district-clause&Itemid=60%'
  8. SELECT *
      FROM jos_migration_backlinks
      WHERE url LIKE 'index.php?option=com\_content&view=article&id=118:the-role-of-presidents-in-local-dc-history&catid=50:district-clause&Itemid=60%' OR sefurl LIKE 'index.php?option=com\_content&view=article&id=118:the-role-of-presidents-in-local-dc-history&catid=50:district-clause&Itemid=60%'
  9. SELECT m.*, c.`option` AS component
      FROM jos_menu AS m
      LEFT JOIN jos_components AS c
      ON m.componentid = c.id
      WHERE m.published = 1
      ORDER BY m.sublevel, m.parent, m.ordering
  10. SELECT template
      FROM jos_templates_menu
      WHERE client_id = 0
      AND (menuid = 0 OR menuid = 60)
      ORDER BY menuid DESC
      LIMIT 0, 1
  11. SELECT a.*, u.name AS author, u.usertype, cc.title AS category, s.title AS SECTION, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug, g.name AS groups, s.published AS sec_pub, cc.published AS cat_pub, s.access AS sec_access, cc.access AS cat_access  
      FROM jos_content AS a
      LEFT JOIN jos_categories AS cc
      ON cc.id = a.catid
      LEFT JOIN jos_sections AS s
      ON s.id = cc.SECTION
      AND s.scope = "content"
      LEFT JOIN jos_users AS u
      ON u.id = a.created_by
      LEFT JOIN jos_groups AS g
      ON a.access = g.id
      WHERE a.id = 118
      AND (  ( a.created_by = 0 )    OR  ( a.state = 1
      AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )
      AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )   )    OR  ( a.state = -1 )  )
  12. UPDATE jos_content
      SET hits = ( hits + 1 )
      WHERE id='118'
  13. SELECT a.id, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug
      FROM jos_content AS a
      LEFT JOIN jos_categories AS cc
      ON cc.id = a.catid
      WHERE a.catid = 50
      AND a.state = 1
      AND a.access <= 0
      AND ( a.state = 1 OR a.state = -1 )
      AND ( publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR publish_up <= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )
      AND ( publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR publish_down >= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )
      ORDER BY a.ordering
  14. SELECT id, title, module, POSITION, content, showtitle, control, params
      FROM jos_modules AS m
      LEFT JOIN jos_modules_menu AS mm
      ON mm.moduleid = m.id
      WHERE m.published = 1
      AND m.access <= 0
      AND m.client_id = 0
      AND ( mm.menuid = 60 OR mm.menuid = 0 )
      ORDER BY POSITION, ordering
  15. SELECT a.*, cc.title AS ctitle, s.title AS stitle,  CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug
     
      FROM jos_content AS a
     
      INNER JOIN jos_categories AS cc
      ON cc.id = a.catid
     
      INNER JOIN jos_sections AS s
      ON s.id = a.sectionid
     
      WHERE ( a.state = '1'
      AND a.checked_out = '0' )
     
      AND ( a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )
     
      AND ( a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )
     
      AND a.access <= 0
      AND cc.access <= 0
      AND s.access <= 0
     
      AND ( a.catid IN (39,42) )
     
      ORDER BY a.created DESC
      LIMIT 0,5
  16. SELECT a.*, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(a.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", a.id, a.alias) ELSE a.id END AS slug, CASE WHEN CHAR_LENGTH(cc.alias) THEN CONCAT_WS(":", cc.id, cc.alias) ELSE cc.id END AS catslug
      FROM jos_content AS a
      INNER JOIN jos_categories AS cc
      ON cc.id = a.catid
      INNER JOIN jos_sections AS s
      ON s.id = a.sectionid
      WHERE a.state = 1  
      AND a.access <= 0
      AND cc.access <= 0
      AND s.access <= 0
      AND (a.publish_up = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_up <= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )  
      AND (a.publish_down = '0000-00-00 00:00:00' OR a.publish_down >= '2023-02-03 08:18:42' )
      AND cc.id = 82
      AND cc.SECTION = s.id
      AND cc.published = 1
      AND s.published = 1
      ORDER BY a.ordering
      LIMIT 0, 5

0 legacy queries logged

    Language Files Loaded

    Untranslated Strings Diagnostic

    None

    Untranslated Strings Designer

    None
    Smok Nord 4 Poppers Türkiye bahis siteleri slot siteleri canlı casino siteleri İstanbul VIP Taksi Kiralama Şehirler arası nakliyat Kacak bahis sitesi Şehirlerarası evden eve nakliyat instagram takipçi bedavasohbetodalari.site instagram takipçi Evden eve nakliyat Türkiye'den Almanya'ya evden eve nakliyat Almanya'ya ev taşıma fiyatları Gebze Evden eve nakliyat Kilit taşı istanbul ofis taşıma Depolama istanbul evden eve nakliyat casino siteleri deneme bonusu veren siteler bahis siteleri deneme bonusu slot siteleri güvenilir bahis siteleri gaziantep escort gaziantep escort Deneme Bonusu Betz 1 Deneme bonusu veren siteler Bonus veren bahis siteleri Casino siteleri Freespin Yatırımsız deneme bonusu istanbul şehirler arası nakliyat Freebet veren siteler Çevrimsiz deneme bonusu veren siteler Slot casino Deneme bonusu forum Bahisikayet.com Deneme bonusu Deneme bonusu veren siteler Bahis forum Forum bahis Bahis forumu Banko tahmin Sosyal içerik platformu Deneme Bonus bahisdene.com jetbahis Rexbet hovarda güncel adres mobilbahis güncel adres sekabet.net asyabahis güncel adres maltcasino güncel adres> pinbahis100.com betduman.com olabahis.top سایت شرط بندی shartkade.com لیست سایت های شرط بندی سایت های پیش بینی یک بت شهر پوکر شرط وین شرط برو 1xbet-mobil.com